DIFFERENTIATION OF MUTAZILA IN ASLAH THEORY / MU‘TEZİLE'NİN ASLAH TEORİSİNDE FARKLILAŞMASI

As a great contributor to Islamic thought Mutazila School has been expressed so much opinion about different Islamic questions. This difference mostly reflected on their polemics. “aslah” is one of these polemics. In this theory considered conjunction with the issue of God's justice Mutazila, the existence of a purpose in creation and has accepted that it is in the servant's benefits. That accepting that there were a number of acts of God without making a goal they say is wrong. With aslah theory God absolute moral perfection that they have and It focuses on the logical explanation that people should be responsible for their actions. Hence in general the majority of school, It was agreed that the best and best of all the acts of God who wills. But what are the issues for which it is most useful servant, God whether have to create them or not, It created an environment that is not causing any other more appropriate setting than this, they was encouraged to disagree on issues. A number of scholars, sending messengers, the notification to be addressed, reward those who are good, punish those who do evil and as to accept the repentance It is most useful for issues such as religious worshipers regard as obligatory to God. Another group looking at the issue from a broader perspective ın addition to the issues mentioned above the creation of universe and issues such as the creation of man regard as obligatory to God. Aslah theory in the school together with them there are also those who completely reject. In this article it is aimed to shed light on the how Basra and Baghdad scholars who are also in Mutazila school slah theory.