On the problem of Ethnophyletism: a historical study. Part III
Journal: Studia Humanitatis (Vol.2017, No. 1)Publication Date: 2017-04-18
Authors : Venediktov V.Y.;
Page : 14-14
Keywords : Church history; Schism; the Bulgarian Greek Church conflict; Constantinople Patriarchate; Constantinople Patriarchy; Ethnophyletism; the Holy and Great Council; Orthodox;
Abstract
The Holy and Great Council on Crete, 2016 has risen an important issue of Ethnophyletism. Russian, Georgian, Bulgarian, and Antiochian Orthodox Churches delegations were not present at the Great Council and were criticized for Ethnophyletism at the plenary session. The heresy of ethnophyletism was announced by the Council of Constantinople in 1872. Now we can see that it became essential nowadays. The article tells about the origin of this heresy and whether the Ethnophyletism may be decided to be the heresy. The author raises issues. How was the schism declared? Who was interested in the Greco-Bulgarian schism? What are the political, ethnic and cultural consequences of the Synod in 1872?
Other Latest Articles
- “Cherubic Hymn” and the Great Entrance in the Kyiv Church in the 17th century. Part I. Prayer “None is Worthy”
- The features of the formation of the socio-psychological climate in the institution of social services
- Political and legal ideology in Modern Russia
- Orthodoxy and economic backwardness: combating the myth
- The role of public diplomacy in the promotion of the European Union brand
Last modified: 2017-04-22 08:58:54