Evaluation of No. P.2013/1356, D.2014/946 Decision of Trabzon Administrative Court on 30.6.2014 and the Mutual Defense of Subjects
Journal: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi - Kirikkale University Journal of Social Sciences (Vol.7, No. 1)Publication Date: 2017-01-31
Authors : Arda Ergene;
Page : 143-162
Keywords : Administrative Procedure; Illegality; Distinguishable Procedures; Stay of Execution;
Abstract
The 12nd article of Administrative Procedure Act says that “Due to the infringement of rights, subjects can directly sue either administrative action for damages or action for annulment to State Council and administrative and tax courts. Furthermore, they can only sue administrative actions for damages all at once. Moreover, they can firstly sue action for annulment. When the case is adjudicated, they can sue administrative action for damages upon the arbitration of the subject or the communique of the arbitration as long as they appeal to the law. Beginning from the execution date, during the continuation of the case they can also sue administrative actions for damages due to the execution resulted in loss. According to the 11st article, the right of recourse is reserved”. In this study, we give a concise and brief explanation on illegality of the administrative decision in terms of aspect, cause and purpose as well as distinguishable procedures and stay of execution. Additionally, the interlocutory and final decisions of Administrative Court of Trabzon are investigated and the mutual defense of parties is assessed.
Other Latest Articles
- Evaluation of Language Learning Strategies of Students Learning Turkish as a Second Language according to Teachers’ Views
- A Pilot Study for the Development of Higher Education Student Mentoring Scale
- Reasons of Ceasing the Secondary Education of Girls
- Attitude towards Collaborative Learning Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
- Conceptual Valuation of Intention to Leave in Organizational Psychology
Last modified: 2017-09-09 23:58:03