THE AUTHORITY DISPUTE OF STATE INSTITUTIONS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BICAMERAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

The purpose of this research is, to know the authority dispute of state institution, in applying of bicameral system in Indonesia which is study to dispute DPR-RI with DPR-RI in execution of function of legislation. This research is an analytical description, that is, by collecting data describing or describing facts, and data and analysis from result of the research, which aims to get picture to support law argument systematically and structured, based on normative juridical that is research analysis based on constitution (Indonesian: Undang-undang), also refers to the facts and supporting theories. The approach of research conducted on the problems in this study using sociological juridical approach(Socio-legal study), which means that, in this study conducted an assessment of the rules, norms prevailing in society and research directed to the function of law in society, associated with positive national law, that applies in Indonesia. The type of research used is empirical law study, and is a legal research method, that seeks to see the law in a real sense and to examine how the law works in society. The authority disputes of state institutions in the application of bicameral system, in Indonesia include: the factors causing the disputes of state institutions in the application of bicameral system, the aspect of the implementation of the legislative function, between DPD-RI and DPR-RI, disputed authority of DPD-RI with DPR- Legislation, dispute resolution mechanisms of state institutions and dispute resolution, results of DPD-RI with Parliament and its impact on the implementation of the legislative function and the steps of reconstruction of state institutions disputes, based on the principles of checks and balances, and the application of bicameral system