THE INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGY LEARNING FACILITIES AND STUDENT MOTIVATION TOWARDS LEARNING INDEPENDENCE (EMPIRIC STUDY ON BIDIKMISI SCHOLARSHIP STUDENTS REGIONAL OFFICE OF UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA AT TERNATE, INDONESIA)
Journal: International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) (Vol.8, No. 10)Publication Date: 2017-10-18
Authors : YUSUF; ANDI SUCI ANITA; ROSALITA AGUSTINI; WILDOMS SAHUSILAWANE; WHIKA FEBRIA DEWATISARI; ELIAKI GULO; EHA SALEHA; MOHBIR UMASUGI; MUHAMMAD ALWI;
Page : 1576-1591
Keywords : Learning Facilities; Learning Motivation; Learning Independence; Bidikmisi Scholarship;
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of learning facilities on students' learning independence, the influence of students' learning motivation on students' learning independence, and the influence of learning facilities and students' learning motivation together towards the independence of student learning. The result of the research shows that there is positive and significant influence of learning tool (X1) on learning independence (Y). It is obtained by t value (2,159) with p = 0.034 <0,05 and t table at 5% significant level with df = 78 equal to 1,991. There is a positive and significant influence of learning motivation (X2) on learning independence (Y). It is obtained t value (7,858) with p = 0.000 <0,05 and t table at 5% significant level with df = 78 equal to 1,991. There is a positive and significant influence of learning facilities (X1) and learning motivation (X2) simultaneously to the independence of learning (Y). This shows the coefficient of double correlation RY (1,2) = 0,746 and R² = 0,557 and price Fhitung equal to 48,980 with p = 0.000 <0,05 and F table = 3,11 at 5% significant level. The coefficient value X1 = 0,186 and X2 = 0,647, constant number equal to 8,650 so that can be made regression equation Y = 8,650 + 0,186X1 + 0,647X2. The higher value of the learning which means (X1) and the learning motivation (X2), the higher the value of the learning independence (Y). The coefficient of determination is R² of 0,557. That means 55.7% learning independence is explained by learning facilities and learning motivation. Meanwhile, 44.3% is explained by other factors that is not discussed in this study.
Other Latest Articles
- DETERMINING THE FACTUAL CONSUMPTION OF THERMAL ENERGY FOR INDIVIDUAL ENERGY ACCOUNTING IN MULTIAPARTMENT BUILDINGS
- DEVELOPMENT OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM OF CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING OF INDIVIDUAL CONSUMPTION OF ENERGY RESOURCES IN APARTMENT BUILDING
- COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EG NOISE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS
- MANAGING THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS BASED ON A NEW MODEL OF VALUE ENGINEERING
- EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE WITH WASTE GLASS
Last modified: 2018-04-20 22:26:43