Content validity by experts judgment: Proposal for a virtual tool

The study describes the advantages of using a virtual tool designed to validate the content of research instruments, through the technique of expert judgment. This study presents the results of a survey applied to experts who participated as judges in the content validation, exposing their opinion and experiences in the validation of instruments. The ethodological design included three phases: the first, related to the design of the virtual tool; subsequently, the application of this tool through a real exercise and with the purpose of validating a questionnaire; for the last phase the results of the seven judges participants were analyzed. The findings show that the use of the virtual tool facilitates the organization of the information in items by dimension, and the registration of the opinion of the judges by the categories of clarity, coherence, relevance and sufficiency.