BOOK REVIEW T.M. RYABUSHKINA «POZNANIE I REFLEKSIYA» [KNOWLEDGE AND REFLECTION] Moscow: Kanon+, 2014
Journal: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology (Vol.4, No. 1)Publication Date: 2015-12-25
Authors : Andrei Patkul;
Page : 322-328
Keywords : Unreflective philosophy of subjectivity; identity of consciousness; reflection; temporality; substantiality; intentionality; projection; preconscious.;
Abstract
The reviewer treats the main theses of the conception of unreflective subjectivity presented in the book. In his opinion, it divides in two main parts. On the one hand, this is the historic-philosophical exposition of the problem of reflectivity and the critique of the reflective philosophy. On the other hand, this is the presentation of the own author's position. The author shows that contemporary criticism of the subject-object model of self-knowledge contains the precondition of reflection and therefore classic and contemporary conceptions of self-knowledge meet similar difficulties. The reviewer discusses the author's interpretation of the philosophies Descartes', Hume's, Husserl's, Heidegger's and Sartre's given in the book. Moreover, he analyses the basic notion of the own author's conception, namely, the preconscious as well as the projection.
Other Latest Articles
- BOOK REVIEW DAN ZAHAVI «SELF AND OTHER. EXPLORING SUBJECTIVITY, EMPATHY, AND SHAME» Oxford University Press. 2014. ISBN 978-0-19-959068-1
- PUBLIC DEBATES ONTOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS: NATURALISM VS. TRANSCENDENTALISM
- "RETRAER" E "POR VÓS" NA CANTIGA DE GUARVAIA
- QUESTION ABOUT THE WORLD AND EUGEN FINK'S COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF KANT'S «CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON»
- THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION RICCARDO LAZZARI. QUESTION ABOUT THE WORLD AND EUGEN FINK`S COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF KANT`S «CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON»
Last modified: 2018-07-13 22:33:23