REFLECTIONS ON THE ARTICLE BY D. FEDCHUK «SCHOLASTIC DISTINCTION IN FINITE BEING AND ONTOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE»
Journal: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology (Vol.3, No. 1)Publication Date: 2014-12-25
Authors : Andrey Patkul;
Page : 251-260
Keywords : Essence; existence; being; entity; ontological difference; fundamental ontology; metontology; scholasticism; idealism; Duns Scotus; Francisco Suбrez; Martin Heidegger; Dmitry Fedchuk.;
Abstract
The paper contains few reflections based on the Dmitry Fedchuk's article published in the volume 2 (2) 2013 of “Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology” under the title “Scholastic Distinction in Finite Being and Ontological Difference”. The Fedchuk's theses that the entity but not the being as such has to be the proper subject of ontology and that the Heidegger's attempt to express by the notions the sense of the being as such was unsuccessful are seconded here. Two points of Fedchuk's view of Heidegger's failure are emphasized also, namely, Heidegger's abstractions of pure being from entities by the ontological difference as well as his reduction of the being to its giveness in the human understanding (Heidegger's idealism). But it is pointed also that Fedchuk's argumentation in his attack on Heidegger isn't always sufficient. For example Fedchuk don't notice that Heidegger believes that the being is always the being of entities and therefore his fundamental ontology should lead to the building of so-called metontology.
Other Latest Articles
- Pengaplikasian Model Awal Kit Asas Membaca Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu Kanak-Kanak Pemulihan Khas
- AN INTERVIEW WITH PROF. JAROSLAV ANATOL'EVICH SLININ (St. Petersburg State University, 12th September 2013)
- THE RULE OF METAPHOR. STUDY 8. METAPHOR AND PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOURSE
- THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION P. RICŒUR THE RULE OF METAPHOR. STUDY 8. METAPHOR AND PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOURSE
- PRACTICAL INTENTIONALITY AND TRANSCENDENTAL PHENOMENOLOGY AS A PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
Last modified: 2018-07-16 16:53:11