ResearchBib Share Your Research, Maximize Your Social Impacts
Sign for Notice Everyday Sign up >> Login

OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF CARDIAC PULMONARY REANIMATION STANDARDS AT THE BASE OF THE SIMULATION TRAINING AND ACCREDITATION CENTER IN RYAZGMU

Journal: NAUKA MOLODYKH (Eruditio Juvenium) (Vol.7, No. 1)

Publication Date:

Authors : ;

Page : 66-71

Keywords : simulation training; standards; accreditation of specialists; cardiopulmonary resus-citation (CPR); quality of medical care;

Source : Downloadexternal Find it from : Google Scholarexternal

Abstract

Aim. This study is dedicated to obtaining a differentiated assessment of the knowledge of the modern European CPR algorithm among doctors depending on their place of work and medical experience before conducting one-day training in the Basic Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation module. Materials and Methods. Analyzed 392 questionnaires with questions on the method of conducting SLL, filled with cadets before the start of classes on working out and consolidating the skills of CPR that meet European standards. The average length of medical service of trainees is 13.9±3.3 years (p≤0.05). Four groups of cadets were allocated to my workplace: 144 working in city and regional general hospitals, 75 in specialized hospitals (cardiologic dispensary, mental hospital, tuberculosis dispensary, etc.) – 75, in CRH – 67, in polyclinics – 106. In each group, there were the number of correct answers to specific questions, expressed in% in relation to the total size of the group. The obtained indicators were analyzed using the methods of variation statistics. Results. According to the results of the survey of cadet doctors given in Table 1 lower initial selfesteem of own knowledge required for CPR is peculiar to doctors of specialized hospitals (42.7±5.7) and clinics (43.3±4.8%), and the highest – to the doctors of the CRH (67.1±5.7%) (p≤0.02). In general, a little more than half of doctors feel themselves sufficiently familiar with the standards of CPR (51.3±2.5%). According to the test results, however, only 24.7±2.2% of respondents carried out the right choice of means of CPR, and the frequency of correct answers, regardless of the place of work, weakly correlated with the medical experience: +0.28±0.05 (p≤0.001). Conclusions. There are significant differences in the level of theoretical knowledge of the standards required for the successful implementation of CPR, depending on the place of work and medical experience. The revealed differences in the knowledge of the doctors in the skill of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the conditions of the Simulation Training Center require special attention when educating doctors of the CDH and polyclinics since. This category of medical workers is least likely to face non-staff, life-threatening situations.

Last modified: 2019-04-02 23:36:14