COMPARISON BETWEEN FLOW CYTOMETERIC METHOD AND OTHER METHODS FORRETICULOCYTE COUNT IN DIAGNOSIS OF PHENYLHYDRAZINE-INDUCED HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA

Reticulocyte count is the salient evidence of the effectiveness of bone marrow to produce red blood cells. Currently, the reticulocyte counting is a challenge for clinical laboratoriesmainly for the ordinary ones, which still use the manual method.This study was designed to evaluate the performance of flow cytometer for reticulocytes counting comparing to traditional and optimized manual methods which helpful in diagnosis of phenylhydazine-induced anemia.For that 45 male white Albino rats were divided into 5 groups, control group,phenylhydrazine group (PHZ) which injected by phz(20 mg/kg b.w, I/P),quercetin+phz group (quercetin, 50 mg/kgb.w per os), silymarin+phz group (silymarin, 100 mg/kgb.w per os) and quercetin group. Whole blood samples of these groups were collected at day 3, 5 and 10 after 1st injection of phz which used for reticulocyte counts by flow cytometeric method and other manual methods in addition to measurement ofCBC and osmotic fragility. Analysis of the results showed that phenylhydrazine injection induced hemolytic anemia with significant reticulocytosis and using of flow cytometer in reticulocyte count more precise, easy and fast than traditional and optimized manual methods. Furthermore, degree of hemolysis was significantly increases in phz group comparing to other groups. Therefore, we concluded that flow cytometric method for reticulocyte counts was simple, fast and highly reliable comparable to traditional and optimized manual methods. Also optimized manual showed that more perfect than traditional manual method and nearly to accuracy of flow cytometeric method.