Comparative Effect of 4 Weeks of Pranayama Breathing Exercise and Respiratory Endurance Training on the Lung Function and Quality of Life on Abdominal Obesity: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Journal: International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (Vol.11, No. 3)Publication Date: 2022-03-05
Authors : Kishore Kumar; Nagaraj; Balchandar;
Page : 875-879
Keywords : Abdominal obesity; Incentive Spirometry; Pranayama Breathing Exercise; Waist Circumference;
- Efficacy of Using Footwork Drills on Footwork Improvement among Badminton Players-Quasi Experimental Study
- THE EFFECT OF BALL BADMINTON GAME ON THE RALLYING ABILITY OF THE BADMINTON PLAYERS AT INTER COLLEGE LEVEL
- A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOME VARIABLES OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM DUE TO POWER SYSTEMS OF BADMINTON PLAYERS
- Efficacy of Sodium Bicarbonate in Early Management and Reduce Vaginal Yeast Infection among Women in Jordan: A Quasi-Experimental Study
- A Quasi Experimental Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Method on the Knowledge and Critical Thinking of Nursing Students about Normal Labour, in Selected Institution of Uttrakhand
Abstract
World Health Organization (WHO) defines overweight and obesity as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health (1) Abdominal adiposity markers like Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) and WC may influence pulmonary function through a mechanism that may restrict the descent of the diaphragm and limit lung expansion, compared to overall adiposity, which may compress the chest wall. Thirty subjects of abdominal obesity were randomised into two groups - group A (Pranayama Breathing Exercise) and Group B (Respiratory Endurance Training). Primary outcome measures of treatment with relative parameters such as: Peak flow meter was used to measure FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC ratio. HRQOL (Health Related Quality Of Life) (SF-36 Questionnaire) contains 36 questions and used to assess quality of life. Each group contains 15 subjects. The duration of this study is 4 weeks. There is significant difference between two treatments (A and B) in terms of average reduction in FEV1 (t = 5.56, p = 0 less than 0.05), FVC (t =-1.293, p = 0.2065 greater than 0.05), FEV1/FVC Ratio (t =-2.11, p = 0.02 less than 0.05) and HRQOL (SF-36) Questionnaire (t =-10.42, p = 0 less than 0.05). Hence, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that Treatment A (Pranayama Breathing Exercise) is effective than Treatment B (Respiratory Endurance Training) in terms of average increase in FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC Ratio and HRQOL (SF-36) Questionnaire.
Other Latest Articles
- Persuasive Strategies in Presidential Election Speeches
- Channels, Barriers in Communication System and Employee Performance: A Comparative Study between Public and Private Sector Banks
- Gambusia Fishes Once a Part of VBDCP: A Topic of Debate Now
- A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Normal Saline Application on Episiotomy Wound Healing among Postnatal Mothers at Gauhati Medical College & Hospital, Guwahati, Assam
- Effect of Attitude and Competency towards ICT on Job Satisfaction of Secondary School Teachers
Last modified: 2022-05-14 21:02:36