The Effects of Leadership Styles and Work Motivation and Performance of the Hotel Staff in Phuket, Thailand

Research articles with objectives 1. To study the characteristics of leadership hotel staff motivation in Phuket area 2. To study the impact of leadership style and work motivation of hotel staff. in Phuket area 3. As a guideline to improve the performance of the leadership style and the motivation of the hotel staff. in Phuket area This is a mixed method research. The population used in this study were -398 employees of a 3-star hotel in Phuket Province. The sample size was determined using the Craig C and Morgan tables. by using a specific random method and a group of 11 key informants. The results of the analysis of the impact on the motivating factors of the hotel staff found that (overall) it was at a moderate level ( = 3.32, S.D. = 0.39). The opinion level was at a high level ( = 3.67, SD = 0.35). In the analysis of leadership characteristics, it was found that the team support was at the highest level ( = 4.59, SD = 0.56) and the results of an analysis of the performance of hotel staff's leadership style and motivation. In Phuket area, it was found that (overall) it was at a high level ( = 4.03, S.D. = 0.64). The analysis of factors affecting the factors affecting the employees' work motivation found that the suitability of the multiple regression equation of the overall variables of factors affecting the factors affecting the employee's work motivation factors. There was a high correlation of .563. The three independent variables that entered the multiple regression model were success at work. The nature of the work performed on the progress of the page the variation of independent variables can be explained by 56.30 with a forecast standard error of .437. The analysis of factors of leadership characteristics revealed that the suitability of the multiple regression equation of the overall variables of leadership characteristics factors. There was a high correlation, i.e., 441. The five independent variables that entered the multiple regression model were vision, adaptation to the situation. employee development being a good role model team support the variability of the independent variables can be explained 67.21 with a forecast standard error of 0.982