Pragmatism and Judicial Restraint
Journal: Athens Journal of Law (Vol.1, No. 1)Publication Date: 2015-01-01
Abstract
This paper examines the tradition and influence of pragmatism and judicial restraint in American legal culture. In order to better understand the intellectual foundation of this tradition, I will examine the jurisprudence of James Bradley Thayer and Oliver Wendell Holmes. I will argue that this discourse has enriched debates about the constitutional relationship between the judiciary and the modern administrative state, and that a deeper understanding of this tradition can help to unravel thorny questions regarding the maintenance of constitutional values in a modern democracy committed to the rule of law.
Other Latest Articles
- The Study of Blood Vessels of Submandibular Gland and Urinary Bladder in Rats Using an Original Morphometric Analysis
- Study of the Intensity and Pathogenesis of Dentofacial Deformities in Patients with Denture Defects
- Status of the Blood Coagulation System in Experimental Treatment of Acute Interstitial Pancreatitis Using Local Hypothermia
- Impact of Atopic Dermatitis on the Psychological State and Social Adaptation of Patients
- Prevention of Placental Dysfunction in Women with Local Non-Progressive Abruption of a Normally Positioned Placenta
Last modified: 2015-11-25 18:53:51