The life cycle of social and economic systems
Journal: Marketing and Management of Innovations (Vol.7, No. 1)Publication Date: 2016-03-15
Authors : S.E. Sardak;
Page : 157-169
Keywords : system; system approach; social and economic system; life cycle; cyclicity; cyclic patterns;
Abstract
The aim of the article. The aim of the article is to identify the components of social and economic systems life cycle. To achieve this aim, the article describes the traits and characteristics of the system, determines the features of social and economic systems functioning and is applied a systematic approach in the study of their life cycle.The results of the analysis. It is determined that the development of social and economic systems has signs of cyclicity and is explained methodologically by the axiomatics, rules and laws. Understanding of circular patterns has been formed long ago and now is recorded by scientists monitoring the properties of natural and artificial environment of human activity.During the study, it was found out that in scientific literature there is no unified description of the life cycle elements of social and economic systems at personal, micro, meso, macro and global levels.The paper investigates the cyclical patterns in multilevel social and economic systems for a human, employee, family, product, company, city, industry, elite, macroeconomic indicators, humanity, global processes, global economic system and the Universe. It is noted that at grass-roots administrative levels of the global environment of a human life activity system, a thesis about the cyclicity of development and the stages of the life cycle is considered by a wide circle of scientists and is doubtless. Onhierarchically higher management levels of the global environment of human activity system, the scientists noticed the similar patterns of the cyclical nature.Problematic and discussion questions about cyclic development of social and economic systems are identified: the uncertainty of the driving force source of repeated changes; the vague distinction between systemic (internal) and off-system (external) influence on development; the lack of a unified description of development nature at different managerial levels; the use of different descriptive terms for the same constituent elements of repeated changes (period, stage, phase, wave, cycle); the uncertainty of the number of repeated changes constituent elements; the absence of an identification mechanism of the exact time of changes in the constituent elements of repeated changes; the surface description of out-of-system period of the subjects activity (before-system period of creation and after-system period of liquidation); attaching more importance to primary and less importance to ultimate component elements of the repeated changes; the lack of reliable mechanism for predicting and forecasting the dynamics of constituent components of repeated changes.It is noted that all social and economic systems are developed within repeated changes and they have the same attributes of cyclicity: the fluctuation of indicators is marked that characterize the condition of the subject; the presence of system (from creation to liquidation) and out-of-system (creation design and liquidation disposal) periods are noted; the subjects are created by the actions of other subjects (that is, subjects do not arise out of nowhere, but are the result of actions of other subjects constructors); after cessation of subjects functioning, their resources are used by other subjects (that is, the subjects do not disappear nowhere, and they are transformed into the resources of other subjects recovery); a unidirectional life cycle from birth to death is observed in the subjects; the subjects do not have to undergo the whole life cycle (each time might be the last); the subjects display similar changes of the indicators during their activity; ascending, peak and descending fluctuations of indicators are observed in the subjects; minor fluctuations occur in the constituent elements; the subjects have individual nature of indicator fluctuations and duration of activity.Conclusions and directions of further researches. The scientific novelty of the study is identification structure of life cycle of social and economic system with definitions of: common (before-system state, growth, stabilization, reduction, after-system state) and specific (creation, slow growth, rapid growth, growth stabilization, short stabilization, rapid reduction, slow reduction, liquidation) constituent elements of repeated changes; marginal borders of indicators; dynamics of constituent elements of life cycle; key points of changing nature of the indicators dynamics.Identification of the life cycle of social and economic systems characterizes potentially possible limits of their activity in time and provides the possibility of further research of aspects of the cyclical development for methodological basis formation and the development of applied measures of systemic development in the areas of marketing and management innovations.
Other Latest Articles
- Models and methods of decision-making in the management of industrial enterprises’ balanced development
- Effect of total quality management and knowledge management on providing services at the manufacturing and service companies
- Development of knowledge management infrastructure in organization
- Methodical frameworks for evaluation of financial and investment component of functionality of innovation-oriented enterprise belonged to machinery industry
- Modernization of industrial enterprises and innovative implementation
Last modified: 2016-04-11 17:32:06