Science ethics

New knowledge is said to be scientific if it includes logical, rational, open and objective nature in all things that provide benefits to the people around them. Therefore, a new scientist is said to be scientific if he has the characteristics mentioned earlier in his daily life, during the course of human life, knowledge does not always have a positive impact on human life, whether its nature can be felt by humans directly or indirectly, so that it can be said that it is a big burden for scientists to make knowledge impact changes for the better for humans, especially for the people who live together and are around the scientists themselves, if they cannot make changes for the better than that knowledge and The scientist, of course, cannot be said to be true knowledge and scientist, because in truth knowledge and scientists who actually walk on their path, of course logically and rationally will provide positive changes for themselves and their society. Sometimes it becomes a dilemma in practice between ethics and knowledge in a scientist who is not always in line between the two in every step, because a number of considerations must be adjusted at the same time, such as: political considerations, kinship, family, health and other personal and social considerations in conducting research. Everyday life, so that it is necessary for a scientist to observe every step of the way to be able to apply ethical knowledge and ethics that breathe knowledge, with the aim that people who are not scientists can take examples from scientists themselves in acting and ethically.