Appeal in Iran and France Civil Procedure Law

In any judicial system, the court judge is obliged to carefully apply all relevant laws and regulations in order to issue an appropriate verdict, in order to prevent the occurrence of mistakes in issuing the verdict, but nevertheless, a percentage of the votes issued by the country's courts are incorrect. To solve them, solutions appropriate to the judicial system, such as appeals, have been provided. Therefore, this article tries to answer the question of appeals in the Code of Ethics by using the descriptive-analytical research method and referring to legal documents. How has the civil proceedings between Iran and France been discussed? In response to this hypothesis, it has been proposed that "it seems that considering that appeal is recognized in Islamic jurisprudence, its acceptance in Iranian law is not inconsistent with the French legal system, with the difference that all formal conditions of appeal in "Iran has been presented in one place, while in French law, formal research procedures for all stages of research, i.e. the main research stage and secondary research, have been stated individually." The conclusion of the article shows that appeals in French law are similar One of the usual ways of complaining about the verdict of the first courts is foreseen and accepted, and its manner and steps in the process of civil and criminal procedure are clearly stated in the laws of this country.