ANTI-CORRUPTION MEASURES: OVERVIEW EFFICIENCY IN TERMS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION

The article devoted to analysis effectiveness of anti-corruption measures in Ukraine. The topic chosen for the analysis is not only new to administrative science, but also to other branches of law. However, most scholars consider this issue in a particular plane — in terms of needs their scientific research. In the case of author, this need is due by European integration processes. Stated that, as beginning of two thousand and twentieth year, it is extremely urgent to develop and implement as soon as possible a system of effective anti-corruption measures that respond to the current challenges of the situation in which our country has found itself. From the aforementioned, the purpose of study is to open up a system of effective anti-corruption measures that meet European standards and are necessary for implementation (modification) in Ukraine. The conducted research convincingly shows that developed and current system of anti-corruption measures is a comprehensive representation of the state's attitude to corruption manifestations in its territory, as well as beyond its borders in the framework of cross-border cooperation. Global administrative reforms are ripe in Ukraine. And it is not just a normatively fixed list of the plan of actions of authorized entities — it is a systematic change of whole state apparatus of public administration, rethinking role of state and society and their interaction, as well as laying the foundation of global transformations in the field of public-private and cross-border partnership. Transparency, accountability, integrity are the three pillars of anti-corruption policy. These are fundamental principles that must be adhered to in order to reduce corruption in both the public and private sectors. Unfortunately, each of them cannot boast of positive achievements of their observance. Accordingly, the current state of anti-corruption policy and its implementation measures are extremely unsatisfactory. It is separately noted that for Ukraine the dominance of preventive anti-corruption measures is unjustified, since our state cannot overcome corruption manifestations without repressive measures due to its fragile position. Only the dualistic nature of public administration's anti-corruption activities will have a positive response.