ANTINOMY OF MORAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE ACTIVITY OF A LEGAL HACKER

The article emphasizes the uncertainties in the legislative field of some categories concerning the moral core of advocacy, which, unfortunately, leaves room for reflection, allowing everyone to judge their actions based on their philosophy of morality. The article proposes a new category of “legal hacking” and shows some antinomies of the moral provisions of advocacy. Several principles (internal imperatives) of a lawyer have been defined, in compliance with which “legal hacking” will never go beyond the immoral and illegal, and the reputation of a lawyer will remain decent.