CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL DECISIONS OF PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION AS AN OBJECT OF TIMELINESS

The article is devoted to the study of criminal procedural decisions of pre-trial investigation as an object of ensuring timeliness. The article analyzes scientific approaches to the definition of criminal procedural decisions. It is proved that criminal procedural decisions of pre-trial investigation as an object of ensuring timeliness should be considered as acts-actions and acts-documents. The specifics of criminal procedural decisions as an object of ensuring timeliness are determined, namely: a significant number of criminal procedural decisions of pre-trial investigation is characterized by a complex adoption procedure; the majority of criminal procedural decisions of pre-trial investigation have a discretionary character of terms of their acceptance; criminal procedural decisions of pre-trial investigation have a clear list of persons authorized to accept them, namely: investigator, coroner, prosecutor, head of the pre-trial investigation body; the head of the inquiry body, the Director of NABU, the Director of ESBU or their deputies (exclusive powers provided for in Part 9 of Article 170 of the CPC of Ukraine), the investigating judge. The classification of criminal procedural decisions of pre-trial investigation according to the following criteria is offered: the subject of decision-making; in accordance with the regulations of the deadlines for making criminal procedural decisions; depending on the need to bring (delivery, referral) the decision to the addressee; depending on the complexity of the decision-making procedure.