Juror: interrogation or interrogation?

The Russian legal order, of course, is not the first to face the need to counteract attempts to exert unlawful influence on jurors. And this expresses the general interest: society wants to have a judicial system that can be trusted; the state is preoccupied with its image, since justice is formally administered in its name; It is vital for the defending party that the case be resolved by an objective and impartial tribunal. Therefore, it is not surprising that in states where a wealth of experience in the administration of justice by a jury has accumulated, not only the very possibility of involving jurors as witnesses is recognized, but also the normative parameters and limits of their interrogation are indicated.