THE CONCEPT OF ERROROUS, INCOMPLETE, UNREASONABLE AND UNTRUTHFUL EXPERT CONCLUSION

In the context of the formation of a rule of law state in Ukraine, the role of forensic examination in legal proceedings is significantly increasing in the process of understanding the mechanism of committing a crime and obtaining evidencebased evidence. An essential condition for increasing forensic activity is the prevention of expert errors that bring down the drain or cast doubt on the evidentiary value of the expert's conclusion. The article discusses the causes, ways to identify and eliminate expert errors. Expert errors are heterogeneous and can be divided into several types. The reasons for expert errors can be objective (lack of a developed methodology or imperfection of the expert methodology used; application). Overcoming the problems of a legal, methodological and organizational and managerial nature in professional forensic activities. Analysis and prevention of expert errors that occurred during the examination. The importance of the competence and professional training of the expert, as well as his ethics and responsibility for providing objective and truthful conclusions.