SOME ASPECTS OF THE STUDY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF COMBATING CORRUPTION IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE STUDY OF THE NORMATIVE DISCIPLINE «LEGAL REGULATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS»

This scientific article examines the study of the administrative and legal foundations of anti-corruption in the context of studying the regulatory discipline «Legal regulation of administrative relations». In particular, administrative law contains a set of normative aspects that influence the sphere of normative discipline, and the basis of such a set reflects the conditions developed by the Council of Europe as a whole. The definition of educational institutions provides several isolated conditions necessary for the eradication of corruption, taking into account the educational environment. A corrupt high-ranking official wants to have the authority to prevent corrupt actions in the exercise of his position. The difficulty in combating corruption is influenced by the difference in corruption in the whole of educational institutions. Some countries have adopted normative legal acts on anti-corruption, distinguishing the sphere between unconscious corruption and acceptable «gifts to a good human destiny». This assumes that such countries have already realized that anti-corruption is a phenomenon that must be eradicated in the educational environment, but each country has its own anti-corruption principles. Individual acts that are considered as a «gift of good will» in one country are considered acts of corruption in another. Anti-corruption is a generally accepted very difficult task, but no country, including Ukraine, has been able to quickly implement this problem in this aspect. Most of the countries managed to achieve success in eradicating the strengthening of corruption from unbridled to its simple presence within the limits, when it has the effect of influencing it as a whole. Among such countries, Singapore and Hong Kong can now be identified, they convincingly managed to do this in an extremely fast time. However, the experience of these countries suggests the presence of some factors that tend not to reflect the success of the implementation of anti-corruption measures in education. The planned corrupt schemes are already widely embedded in the social foundations of the country and therefore it is very difficult and difficult to influence them as a whole. Therefore, persons responsible for countering corrupt acts, such as educationalists, judicial authorities, expect to separately receive profitable activities from corrupt acts and therefore are undesirably involved in the implementation of the necessary anti-corruption acts as a whole. However, corruption acts are a multifaceted and factorial guarantee of problematic aspects, which is rarely carried out by a single factor, that is why it should be foreseen systematically and comprehensively, with the involvement of additional levers of science applied in various directions. Therefore, anti-corruption educational directions and norms are implemented simultaneously in the European states as a whole.