Conditions, Logic and Methodological Support For the Development and Implementation of the “Ukraine’s Post-war Recovery Plan”

Analysis and generalization of the trends in the development of the global economy and geopolitics provides epistemological and scientific and practical grounds to conclude that the absence of a strategically oriented and at the same time as specific in content regulatory and legal document “Ukraine's Post-war Recovery Plan” poses a challenge and threat not only to Ukraine. At the same time, the “Ukraine Recovery Plan”, presented to the Ukraine Reform Conference URC 2022 in Lugano, in its final document “Lugano Declaration” was rightly defined as a ” Recovery and Development Plan draft”, which “requires consultations and adaptability”. Another one – Ukraine Facility Plan is not strategic by itself, because it is initially limited in time to the period 2024-2027. World experience shows that the specificity of such strategically oriented plans is ensured, first of all, by the implementation of a set of instruments-regimes aimed at achieving specifically set tasks within clearly defined time periods. Thus, in a focused definition, this projection presents a complex interdisciplinary and intercultural problem of economic regimeology regarding the elaboration on the basis of generalization of the relevant world experience of economic regimes for the development and implementation of the “Ukraine's Post-war Recovery Plan”. The purpose of the article: on the basis of an analysis of the world experience of the post-war development of the countries of Europe and the Indo-Pacific subregion, to identify economic regimes for the purpose of further development of the “Ukraine's Post-war Recovery Plan” and to determine approaches to methodologically ensuring their implementation in domestic practice.