PROFESSIONAL SELECTION OF JUDGES UNDER THE NEW JUDICIAL REFORM: QUALIFICATION EVALUATION OF JUDGES

This article is devoted to research the qualifying evaluation of judges and prove its relevance in today's time. This article compares and analyzes the Law of Ukraine «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges» of the old and the new version, paid special attention certain very important aspects of judicial reform. Disclosed features, positive and negative aspects of judicial reform its compliance with today's realities. The stated his own opinion on the reform in general and qualifying evaluation of judges in particular. These and analyzes and forecasts the impression of different people about the future of this reform. A familiarization with the new key and one of the judges — the High Council of Justice and with such innovations as the judicial dossier and other innovations. Also, the article presents and analyzes the main obstacles to qualification assessment and the ability of judges to overcome these obstacles. The basic aspects of the selection of judges qualification exam, interview and more. The basic stages of the qualification evaluation of judges. Focuses on specific evaluation criteria judges. Confirm opinion on the «open door» young professionals as judges. Reasonable major powers of the Public Council of virtue, as a relatively new phenomenon in the judicial reform in the area of evaluation of judges and its importance for the High Qualification Commission in particular. The necessity of creating a new system of professional evaluation of judges, their training and retraining. Calls for regular evaluation of judges. Proposed amendments to the law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges». The stated level prospects of reform of judges, including the assessment of their professional, ethical, moral and other levels. Emphasized on further analysis of the problem and implement clear principles of judicial power.